[MSA-talk] Plate tectonic Ig/Met Pet syllabus

Hanna Nekvasil hanna.nekvasil at stonybrook.edu
Fri Dec 29 16:54:21 EST 2017

David, I was really struck how much of the undergraduate petrology course I
teach parallels yours. Before I start at the mid-ocean ridges, however, I
teach a basic thermodynamics mini-course where the students predict
reaction stability from G,V,S etc, learn about ideal and non-ideal mixing,
construct G-X diagrams for simple igneous systems and use them to construct
the basic phase diagrams. It is this phase diagram knowledge that they use
repeatedly in my presentation of the "Wilson cycle". We focus on suites of
rocks and how they are produced in the varied tectonic environments.
Because of this extensive time-consuming intro, metamorphic petrology is
given as a lightening mini course where they are introduced to chemographic
diagrams and ultimately use them to determine the P-T path of a metamorphic
terrain and determine mineralogical assemblages and protoliths of specific
lithologies in the terrain, following Phillpotts' excellent examples. I
have found no textbook that I can use.

Best wishes to all for the New Year!  Hanna

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:08 AM, David Dolejs <
david.dolejs at minpet.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:

> Dear Matt and all,
> this is an interesting idea -- I have been dealing with similar isuue for
> some time, primarily driven by question how to design petrology courses at
> three subsequent levels from junior bachelor to senior master level.  I
> like to place emphasis on geodynamic context at the advanced bachelor level
> and on physico-chemical aspects (structure and properties of silicate
> melts, phase diagrams, metamorphic thermodynamics, deformation mechanisms)
> in the master.  I realize that this may also offer additional advantage if
> your bachelor curriculum does not have a senior bachelor class on plate
> tectonics (or geodynamics).
> I am not sure if you want to couple igneous and metamorphic processes
> together or just place igneous or metamorphic aspects into geodynamic
> structure of your course.
> For the igneous part, I start with mid-ocean ridges (vertical structure of
> the Earth's mantle, adiabatic melting), then subduction zones
> (fluid-present melting or "silicothermal" plumes, differences imposed by
> water and oxidation state leading to contrasts between tholeiitic and
> calc-alkaline series), mechanisms of magma differentiation (MASH) in the
> arcs, continental collision (dehydration melting, types of partial melts,
> differentiation towards granites, granite types), post-collisional
> extension, anorogenic settings (anorthosites, aluminous A-types), plumes
> and continental breakup (systematics of basaltic melts with pressure and
> degree of partial melting, origin of carbonatites, continuum of
> basaltic-kimberlitic-carbonatitic melts, differentiation and diversity of
> alkaline rocks).  It may not be bad to start with plumes (+ LIP), breakup
> (layered intrusions), rift, ridges etc. until post/anorogenic settings.
> For the metamorphic processes, a comparable scheme is more difficult to
> build.  Perhaps one way is to introduce metamorphic gradients in geodynamic
> and temporal context (see reviews by Mike Brown), then follow similar
> framework as above: low-pressure metamorphism near mid-ocean ridges (sea
> floor), high- und ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism in the subduction zones
> (+ discussion of mechanics, de/relamination, exhumation etc.), metamorphic
> pairs in arcs (adding low/medium-P metamorphism of the arc crust),
> collisional metamorphism (Barrovian type), extension of the continental
> crust, exhumation of metamorphic domes, migmatite complexes (possibly
> melting in the crust), concluded with metamorphic styles in the Archean.
> It will, however, be difficult to find resources for this type of class
> (perhaps: Johnson & Harley; Nicollet - Metamorphisme et Geodynamique).
> If you truly want to mingle metamorphic and magmatic processes, then I
> would look at geodynamic resources (Frisch et al.; Condie) and condense it
> from those.
> I would be happy to hear anyone else's opinion as well.
> Best wishes, also for the new year, to all,
> David
> --
> David Dolejs  (Professor of Mineralogy & Petrology)
> Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Freiburg
> Albertstr. 23b, 79104 Freiburg i.Br., Germany
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Albertstr.+23b,+79104+Freiburg+i.Br.,+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Tel direct: +49 (0)761 203 6395 / secretary: +49 (0)761 203 6396
> Fax: +49 (0)761 203 6407
> Web: http://www.minpetro.uni-freiburg.de/team/dolejs
> _______________________________________________
> MSA-talk mailing list
> MSA-talk at minlists.org
> http://lists.minlists.org/mailman/listinfo/msa-talk

*Hanna Nekvasil*
*Professor of Geochemistry*
*Department of Geosciences*
*Stony Brook University*
*Stony Brook, NY 11794-2100*
*(631) 632-8201  FAX 631-632-8240 *
*Hanna.Nekvasil at stonybrook.edu <Hanna.Nekvasil at stonybrook.edu>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.minlists.org/pipermail/msa-talk/attachments/20171229/7e2fd75b/attachment.htm>

More information about the MSA-talk mailing list